There was another similar thread recently, where someone retold their view of a dinner party, presented the discussion in a way that specifically highlighted the reasonableness of that person's actions, and then openly asked if they did something wrong.
The natural reaction I had in both cases was -- based on the way we were given the facts, how could we think anything other than the idea that the OP was completely right and the offending party was a complete loser. But maybe the facts we were given didn't tell the whole story.
If the OP really wanted to know if this person's views were justified, then we could probably get some more facts and leverage the community here to learn more about how particular people may view this subject.
If the point is just to grow camaraderie and make the OP feel better, then this thread did just that. But that's no reason to take offense at someone who might challenge the presentation of the original facts.
↧